Press Release by FAAS
SWIA Inspection Report
We have always stated that this report would never uncover the
truth and this has been proved today.
Having spoken with SWIA representatives today, serious concerns
about the credibility of the report have been raised.
No professional involved in the case was interviewed as part
of this investigation.
The report of this investigation has been drawn up solely from
reviewing documentation provided by the authorities. There are
two main problems with this:
1) The accuracy of some of this information is already under
dispute.
2) Not all the documentation relating to this case has been reviewed
by the SWIA.
The origin of the Satanic Ritual Abuse allegations which drew
in so many innocent people has not been addressed. These beliefs
have been discredited in previous investigations, including the
report by Professor Jean La Fontaine, published by the Department
of Health in 1994. Who after reviewing SRA cases from across England
and Wales, concluded that there was no evidence supporting the
existence of Satanic Ritual Abuse. As with most of the previous
cases of SRA, it centres on a family already known to have problems,
though the nature and extent of those problems is not known to
us.
This does not however, justify the large scale destruction of
other families, in order to support beliefs which have never been
supported by evidence, and in the process destroying any chance
of finding and convicting anyone who may be genuinely guilty.
These Satanic allegations are what drew innocent people into
this case, our names will not be cleared until this is addressed.
Their remit when conducting this investigation did not include
the investigation of some organisations whose involvement with
the children was central to the development of this case. (Paragraph
3 of the Introduction to the report.)
This report has not been a comprehensive and complete investigation
into this case and has not addressed any of the issues on which
we have campaigned over the last two years.
A public inquiry must be held in order to address all the issues
we have raised over the last two years and here today.
Until that happens, the truth will not be exposed and the possibility
that this will happen again will remain.
A more detailed response will be made following a full review
of the content of the report.
False Allegations Action Scotland.
www.faascotland.co.uk
7 October 2005