PRESS RELEASE
FOR IMMEDIATE USE
January 2005
New research claims Prison Service and Parole Board's
failure to acknowledge wrongful imprisonment is unjustifiable
New research published in The Howard Journal of
Criminal Justice criticises the failure of the Prison Service
and Parole Board to acknowledge the imprisonment of innocent people,
terming it untenable and bordering on the illegal.
It is inevitable that innocent people will be victims
of wrongful imprisonment. However, the Parole Board will only
acknowledge the judgment of the court and refuses to allow for
any human fallibility. In his article, Michael Naughton distinguishes
two broad categories of wrongful imprisonment. He also demonstrates
that life prisoners who maintain that they are innocent of the
crimes for which they were convicted are less likely to be considered
for parole than offenders who admit their guilt.
He substantiates his case by analysing two key sources
of information given to life prisoners about the structure of
their sentences and the procedures through which they might possibly
achieve release from prison. He also undermines the Parole Board's
claim that the 'parole deal,' which attempts to make innocent
prisoners acknowledge guilt for crimes they did not commit, does
not exist.
Naughton calls for the possibility of wrongful imprisonment
to be acknowledged by the Prison Service and Parole Board and
for more adequate and appropriate mechanisms for dealing with
prisoners who maintain their innocence to be devised.
Notes to Editors
· Michael Naughton is a lecturer at the School
of Law and Department of Sociology, University of Bristol.
· Why the Failure of the Prison Service and
the Parole Board to Acknowledge Wrongful Imprisonment is Untenable
will be published in the February 2005 issue of The Howard Journal
of Criminal Justice. A full copy of the article can be obtained
from Rebecca Wray at Blackwell Publishing. Email: Rebecca.Wray@oxon.blackwellpublishing.com
· The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
is the pre-eminent journal of criminology in Europe, and is edited
by Professor David Wilson of UCE in Birmingham and Dr Tony Fowles
of the Lancashire Probation Board.
For more information on The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice
visit:
www.blackwellpublishing.com/hojo