About FAA Scotland

Wrongly Accused Stories

Volunteers

What action can I take to make this easier to bear?

Legal Advice

Contact Us

Make a Donation

Useful Links

FAA Constitution

Falsely Accused Victims' Stories

faction news letters

safari news letter

Lewisgate

BRYCE'S PAGE

BOOKS TO HELP

TERROR, HISTERIA & PANIC

Social services info

Law and help info

Political matters

Campaigns for Justice

EXPERTS GOOD AND BAD

You can help FAAS to fight for justice in Scotland by making a donation or by using the amazon adds on this site to get all your reading and viewing requirements.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Where does the Royal College of Psychiatry in Scotland really stand on Can of Worms?
The report by Karen McVeigh (March 6) about the concerns being expressed by the Scottish division of the Royal College of Psychiatry about the booklet, Can of Worms, led to a flurry of correspondence and an immediate denial by the royal college that it intended to call for the withdrawal of the booklet.
You published a letter from the college, signed by Dr Tom Brown, and others, which was very complimentary about the content of the booklet, claiming their concerns were about material that constituted only a tiny part of the overall content. I know the concerns that I expressed in these columns were shared by other individuals and organisations, including the Canadian False Memory Support Group in Ontario, which wrote to the royal college.
On March 20, Dr Tom Brown replied to the Canadian group in the following terms: "It should be clear that there were aspects of this booklet with which we were deeply unhappy. We note the sensible position statement published by the Canadian Psychiatric Association and share many of its concerns, including its great concern about any so-called 'recovered memory techniques'."
That is not quite the position claimed by Dr Tom Brown et al when they wrote to The Herald, and I have written to the president of the royal college, Professor Sheila Hollins, asking for clarification. As soon as you carried Karen McVeigh's report, and it became clear there were serious concerns about the nature of the publication, Can of Worms, the child protection industry moved into gear to assure your readers that all was well.
Now it would appear there are, indeed, grave doubts about the publication, in the minds of the members of the Royal College of Psychiatry. The public have a right to be made aware of what those doubts are and why they are held. Too many lives have already been destroyed by those who claim a monopoly of concern for the welfare of children to allow this issue to be swept under the carpet.
Jim Fairlie,

 


Google
Search WWW Search www.faascotland.co.uk