The accusations couldn’t have been more lurid. They told
of devil worship, with blood being drunk as children were raped.
But this week, with their lives in utter ruins, it was revealed
there was not a scrap of evidence against this couple. So what
on earth was going on?
SPECIAL INVESTIGATION
Daily Mail October 15th 2005
by Fiona Barton and Rosie Waterhouse
THE scene is horrifying. A group of weeping children are forced
to witness orgiastic sex scenes between masked and chanting men
and women before they are raped and abused.
There is bestiality enacted while chickens and rams are ritually
slaughtered and their blood drunk by one of the celebrants. The
children’s limbs are thrust into a fire, cigarettes are
stubbed out on their arms and they are compelled to watch videos
of people being tortured and murdered. This was the shocking ‘eye-witness’
account that persuaded police and social workers that the Devil
was at work on the God-fearing Isle of Lewis in the Outer Hebrides.
Two years ago, the authorities arrested those named by the ‘witness’,
Mrs A. In all, nine people, including a 75-year-old grandmother,
were charged with rape, and lewd and indecent practices.
The shockwaves created in the tiny island community reverberated
all across Britain and saw those caught up in the scandal treated
as pariahs. Yet now, it appears that the satanic sex ring was
all the figment of a woman’s troubled mind. This week an
official report showed that although there was evidence of abuse
within one family, there was no wider network of devil worshippers.
The nightmare scenario described in such graphic detail appears
to have had no basis in fact.
A special investigation by the Daily Mail, drawing on official
documents and interviews, can now show how flawed the case was
and how lives were destroyed by gossip and gullible authorities
A decade after similarly flawed allegations in the Orkneys, Rochdale
and Nottingham led to an official report concluding that ritual
abuse was largely a myth, how could this have happened again?
Such dark and disturbing matters were a world away from the simple
good life that Ian and Penny Campbell sought when they came to
Lewis. The couple brought their two eldest children to live on
the island when the crime and yobbery of inner-city Birmingham
became too much.
‘We wanted a better life,’ Penny says. ‘Our
eldest had just started school and he was coming home with swear
words he had picked up in the playground. Our flat was robbed
and my handbag stolen from my car and we decided this was not
where we wanted our children to grow up.’
In November 1997, they organised a council-house exchange with
a family on Lewis without even visiting the island. To start with,
they were delighted with their new surroundings.
Penny, 33, who was born in Dundee, says: ‘We heard it was
remote and quiet, which suited us. We liked life on the island.
It was a much safer environment for the children. We didn’t
have to watch them all the time and they made friends quickly.’
The couple, who now have five children aged two to 14, bought
their own home — a dilapidated two-bedroom stone house in
the village of South Dell — and started to restore it, while
Ian worked at a fish factory. ‘Everything was fine until
that morning,’ says Ian, a 40-year-old originally from Guernsey.
That morning was October 3, 2003, when a team of plain clothes
police officers and social workers raided the house at 6am with
a warrant for the arrest of both adults.
Penny, a dark-haired, motherly figure in a long skirt and sweatshirt,
still breaks down and weeps at the memory. ‘They came to
the door and Ian answered it,’ she says. ‘They showed
him a piece of paper and said he was being arrested for child
abuse. It was weird, it was like everything stopped — you
were frozen in time with all this going on around you.
‘The children were still asleep and I had to get them up
and dressed. Ian was taken out in handcuffs and I was told not
to cry because I was upsetting the children, but I couldn’t
help it. ‘They wouldn’t tell the children what was
happening, just that they had to go with them to town. They say
I fed the baby but I don’t remember and then the children
were taken out. They were still asking what was going on, they
were really upset. I said it would be OK and I would see them
later. I was telling them that, but at the time I didn’t
know if I was going to see them again. I was trying not to worry
them.’ She didn’t see them again for two days and
was not allowed to speak to them on the phone. She could only
write them a letter, which the authorities read before passing
on.
Ian, meanwhile, was being interrogated for four hours at Stornoway
police station. He is a tall man with striking eyes and a soft
voice.
He is also a pagan and believes in celebrating the cycles of
nature and cherishing the Earth’s resources. While such
believers may seem strange, they are peace-loving and certainly
have no links whatsoever with devil worship.
It might have been easier for him to deny his faith, but Ian
is quite open about his beliefs and points out there are no altars
or shrines in the house because, he says, he doesn’t feel
comfortable with that aspect of paganism.
When Ian was told he had been arrested for abusing two young girls,
the daughters of a couple he and Penny had met a couple of times
when they arrived, he was appalled.
As transcripts of the police interviews show, he protested his
innocence from the start with a mixture of astonishment and confusion.
The interviews began with questions about wife-swopping and whether
he was sexually attracted to children, but quickly turned to his
religion. Ian said his beliefs were a personal matter because
he was not sure what he believed himself. But whether through
honesty or naiveté, he did admit being curious about the
occult. The transcript of the interview goes as follows:
‘Police Officer: Do you know anyone else who — or
have you ever heard of anybody else who — practises the
occult?
Ian Campbell: No, I don’t, I don’t know of anyone
else who actually practises that kind of religion.
PO: Have you any knowledge of the use of statues in practising
the occult? What about the ritualistic killing of animals? Ritualistic
dress, as in gowns that type of thing? Do you have any books about
witchcraft?
IC: Umm, Wicca witches and things like that? Yes, in the kitchen.
PO: Wicca witches? What’s that?
IC: Well, paganism, you don’t know about paganism?
PO: I don’t
IC: It is not against the law. Paganism is basically people who
believe in Mother Earth. It’s not witchcraft as in, you
know, flaming voodoo sort of things.’
Ian was then told that the abused children had identified him
as a man known as ‘Tommy’ — a
name he has never used — and had accused him of raping and
indecently assaulting them.
Their mother also accused Penny of sexually abusing the girls
and assisting in the rapes. Even on paper, Ian’s distress
is palpable as the allegations become more lurid. He even tries
to turn off the tape.
But the questioning continues: ‘Ian, I have information
that you were involved in devil-worshipping ceremonies. Have you
ever been into devil worship?
IC: No, not at all!
PO: The information we have is that this has taken place and that
you did use to dress up in a long white gown and wore masks, as
did your wife Penny, and that you carried out some form of ceremony
during which there was dancing, and that your children were dressed
up in a similar manner to yourselves and there was music being
played, described as Indian music.
‘And also that during this, some form of chanting or praying
took place. Further to that, there was information given to us
that whilst this was being conducted, it was being videoed on
a camcorder.
‘Have you been in a position of seeing any videos which
would depict serious sexual abuse? People being killed, and I’m
not talking acting here? Have you ever drunk the blood of a chicken?
Have you ever witnessed anybody else doing that? Ever drunk the
blood of any other animal?’
The interview ends in a howl from Ian, who repeats: ‘I can’t
hear you, I can’t hear you’ as the officers start
to charge him with rape. Penny was freed without charge but faced
similar questions. And at the same time, other suspects from the
island were being interrogated. John Sellwood, a 67-year-old former
lorry driver, was arrested, together with his wife Sue. Today,
he says: ‘It was completely mad. I was supposed to have
had sex with eight women at one of these ceremonies and then had
sex with the girls afterwards.
‘I run a cat rescue centre and spend hundreds on vet’s
bills having sick animals put down, and they accused me of slaughtering
animals. I am a Mormon and they asked me if I wore a cape or a
mask. I have no idea where this thing came from.’
Therein lies the key to this complex and profoundly troubling
story. How did police ever come to believe a host of Lewis islanders
were part of a satanic circle? Where did the lurid suggestion
come from?
Astonishingly, the Mail can now reveal that it is probable that
the issue of devil worship was introduced by a police officer
during an interview with an emotionally troubled and traumatised
woman.
Mrs A has learning difficulties and epilepsy and was sexually
abused by her own father during her teens.
Her daughters, now 16, 14 and 12, had been taken into care after
making allegations that they had been sexually abused. Their mother,
who they said witnessed some of the assaults, denied it but later
changed her story as names of possible suspects were put to her.
In August 2003, the police interviewed the mother over 11 days
and the allegations began to come thick and fast. She claimed
she had witnessed her husband and two men raping and sexually
assaulting one of their daughters. Then she said the wife of one
of the abusers and her own mother were also joining in. It is
clear from records seen by the accused that PC Andrew Blakey,
the 30-year-old investigating officer who had been with the force
for six years, was becoming worried about the mother’s credibility
as a witness.
In statements disclosed to the accused, he said: ‘We were
very conscious everyone the father had an association with was
being named by the mother as a suspect, and at that stage these
were not names that the girls had mentioned.’
He continues: ‘By this stage I was wondering who would
be next. It was getting more fantastical each day. These names
came out because we were starting to mention associates of the
father, i.e. ones who had been in and around the house.
‘We would say: “Do you know X? Tell me what you know.
Was he involved in this?”’
Then on August 28, Satan made his entrance. During an interview
with PC Blakey, the mother accused a couple she called ‘Tommy
and Penny’ of abusing her daughters. According to notes,
PC Blakey said: ‘When I asked the mother if she knew anything
about the Devil, she stated that Tommy and Penny were involved
in devil worshipping and stated that this was involved in the
abuse of the girls.
‘The reason Tommy and Penny were mentioned was because (one
of the girls) had given a list of ten names and they were on it.
We had done a check on who we thought “Tommy” was
and one of his antecedents was about devil worship.’
This ‘antecedent’ reference is not explained —
there is certainly nothing in Ian’s past to link him with
Satanism. The Campbells suspect the officer, their local policeman,
had heard about Ian’s paganism on the grapevine and leapt
to the wrong conclusions about the faith. In his notes, PC Blakey
says he deliberately had not briefed himself on the details of
devil worship so he would not have preconceived ideas. But the
mother soon educated him.
She claimed the 13 abusers wore robes and masks, drawing pictures
of them. She said animals were involved in the abuse and she and
the girls were forced to watch videos of ‘sexual acts and
real deaths’ during ceremonies and they were all made to
put their arms into flames.
Astonishingly, all of this, which appears from legal statements
to have been uncorroborated by any other witness, formed a central
plank in the questioning. Ian says: ‘As soon as I said I
was a pagan, I was sunk. Pagan meant devil worshipper in their
books so I was guilty. It is absolute nonsense. Pagans don’t
even believe the Devil exists — it is a Christian invention.’
Murdo Fraser, Chief Inspector of the Western Isles Northern Constabulary
claimed the investigation was of a high standard and his force
had ‘a sufficiency of evidence to charge a number of people,
and we did.’ But the Crown Counsel disagreed and dropped
the case.
Now the girls, who are in foster care, are planning a private
prosecution of their alleged abusers. It is the final straw for
the Campbells and Sellwoods.
Sue Sellwood, who was freed after questioning when one girl changed
her story and said Sue didn’t know about the abuse, says:
‘We have lost everything. We used to run markets and the
Santa’s Grotto but we can’t now. As far as everyone
is concerned, we are paedophiles.
‘We want to move away as soon as we can.’
Ian adds: ‘The atmosphere in the house has changed. It
is no longer a home. We don’t want to stay on the island.
We are looking to go anywhere as long as it is off here. ‘We
need to move on. We waited for the report so people wouldn’t
think we were running away but the feeling in the village is very
hostile despite the charges being dropped. ‘Here, they believe
there is a devil somewhere. I suppose they think it is us.’
Daily Mail October 15th 2005
FAAS comment
is coaching children a form of
torture we claim it is planting
lies into their lives is real evil, and those who use this method
to get the results they want should be locked up for child abuse.
Our hope is that social workers, NCH, and the police should take
note!!!!..