The Times February 22, 2006
Big charities urged to stop shouting and start working
By Sam Coates
LARGE charities such as the NSPCC should spend more time helping
vulnerable individuals and less time engaging in political campaigns,
Iain Duncan Smith said yesterday.
The former Tory leader, who is heading a review on social justice
for David Cameron, launched a blistering attack on big charities,
claiming that they had become arms of government who rarely take
risks. “They look over their shoulder at government the
whole time because they are their source of funding,” he
said.
He complained that there were few “believers” in
big charities because they relied on paid staff rather than volunteers,
and this helped to contribute to cynicism and “giving fatigue”
amongst the public. “As Big Charity gets ever closer to
Big Government, it increasingly mirrors its thinking and behaviour,”
he said. “State bureaucracies feel threatened by new thinking
and different approaches.”
He pointed to a recent poll commissioned by the Centre for Social
Justice. This asked, “If you only had £200 to give
to a good cause, who would you give it to?” Only 4 per cent
opted for a national charity, he said, contrasting this with the
31 per cent who would give to a local charity or church working
with needy people.
He singled out the NSPCC and Scope as examples of “bad”
charities. Of the NSPCC, he said: “I can’t remember
a single thing on the ground that the NSPCC have done.”
This has infuriated the charity, which accused Mr Duncan Smith
of getting his facts wrong. A spokeswoman said: “Less than
10 per cent of our funding comes from government, we have 500
volunteers and we are not risk averse. There is no doubt about
the independence of the organisation and we speak very strongly
on behalf of children who have been abused.” She added that
Mr Duncan Smith had spent a lot of time in Scotland, where the
NSPCC did not operate.
A spokesman for the National Council for Voluntary Organisations
also rejected Mr Duncan Smith’s theses. “You cannot
apply the private sector model of ‘big is bad; small is
good’ to the voluntary sector,” he said.