A Live Wyre
Ray Wyre credited as a child protection expert and a sex crime
consultant. He began his current career as a probation officer
trained in social work in UK prisons, in his past he trained to
become a Baptist Minister. It is during his time at HMS Albany,
that Wyre began to branch away from accepted methods for handling
those convicted of sex offences.
It was normal for a convicted person to meet on a one to one
basis with the Probation Officer, Wyre chose instead to give 3
or 4 the same appointment, though he denied that he considered
this to be a group. At the time, the Prison Officer's Association
were unhappy with this, as they felt it introduced unnecessary
risks to the meetings.
The value of group therapy in these situations is also disputed
by research. It has been found in at least one study (Romero and
Williams, 1983) that ‘the addition of group psychotherapy
to conventional probation supervision did not significantly reduce
sex offender recidivism‘.
Wyre continued to pursue his own methods and in the 1980's began
to influence social work child protection practices more heavily.
In 1988 he introduced the satanic element to the large scale
Nottingham case. Having been contacted by Tim Tate, journalist,
Wyre passed on lists of 'satanic indicators' (lists of symptoms
which are claimed to indicate the child has been a victim of SRA)
to the children's foster parents. He also briefed them on what
to look for, encouraging the foster parents to keep journals on
the children's behaviour and anything the children discussed.
In the subsequent enquiry into the case, Wyre was heavily
criticised for his actions and influence on the case. As
the bizarre allegations became more and more fantastic, a rift
formed between police investigating the case, who could
find no evidence supporting the allegations, and the social workers,
who were adamant that this abuse had occurred. Police
refused to accept any further allegations, and refused to accept
as evidence the journals that Wyre had urged the foster parents
to keep.
A committed believer in the SRA movement, Ray Wyre continued
to spread his beliefs, as did other workers swept up in the tide
of hysteria. An associate of Wyre's, Pamela Klein, also lectured
at joint training conferences for police and social workers on
the subject of SRA. Originally from Illinois, and a rape crisis
worker, Klein's activities had previously been criticised by an
Illinois judge, who stated that she "was not a legitimate
therapist" and that she was not licensed to practice.
Wyre and Klein both were instrumental in spreading the SRA movement
through Australia and New Zealand. Klein’s list of indicators
included bedwetting, a fear of ghosts and nightmares. Four of
those involved in the infamous McMartin pre-school scandal in
the US, also targeted Australia and New Zealand. Almost immediately
cases with strikingly similar allegations to those already seen
in the US and UK sprang up.
Despite being criticised for his influence on the Nottingham
case, and warnings that training workers to look for these indicators,
and the methods used to elicit the desired responses from the
interviewees were dangerous and should be stopped, Wyre continued.
In June 1994, another satanic ritual abuse case broke in
Pembroke, Wales. It was revealed that workers in the case had
attended a 3 day conference held by Wyre.
It was in 1988 that Wyre set up the Gracewell Clinic in Birmingham,
the first clinic designed to treat men convicted of sex offences.
Men were referred to the Clinic for treatment following an assessment,
it also required (as with all SOTPs [Sex Offender Treatment Program])
that the men voluntarily agree to receiving treatment, and that
in doing so they admit guilt and responsibility for the offences
of which they have been accused. In the case of a man who has
been sentenced, a refusal to admit guilt and to participate in
a treatment programme can see him returned to court and re-sentenced.
A claim of innocence is never accepted as such, and instead is
always considered as a denial by the accuser to accept what he
did.
In ‘Men and Crime’, Issue 13, Summer 1992, Wyre
admitted that a form of treatment used at the Gracewell Clinic,
was that of ‘masturbation satiation’. A technique
originally devised by W.L. Marshall, which makes us of deviant
or illegal material as part of the therapy, and claimed by some
to be effective in reducing re-offending. It is a form of therapy
which any innocent man would likely find upsetting and disturbing.
Though alternative therapies such as electro-shock aversion and
foul odour are reported to be successful, researchers want to
see verbal or masturbatory satiation become a standard treatment.
Wyre further recommends that treatment is mandatory.
Opinions on Wyre's methods include the following; "cognitive
therapies have become confrontational and frankly coercive."
"(T)here is something of a culture shock for those with a
foundation in traditional psychotherapy when confronted with Wyre's
methods." It is pointed out that there is no doctor-patient
relationship, and none of the confidentiality that medical ethics
normally require.
Wyre claimed that at that time, no-one who had been treated at
Gracewell had re-offended. This is not the achievement that it
appears to be. Wyre excludes from the outset, via the assessment,
anyone who he feels he cannot work with. If he chooses to refuse
to treat someone who’s behaviour is so far detached from
what would be expected from an average member of society, that
there is little or no hope of rehabilitation, and instead
chooses to treat men who have little or no criminal evidence against
them, it is no surprise that he can claim that none have gone
on to re-offend.
Incredibly, he has also admitted that the questionnaire which
was used in the assessment pack he provided the men with, received
similar responses from the accused and from ordinary men in the
community. Exactly what value and purpose this questionnaire had
if the answers were the same from all men is unclear. You could
assume from this that all men have the potential to act on deviant
fantasies, or the accused he is treating are innocent.
Further indication that Wyre seems to have difficulty in differentiating
between those who are innocent and those who are guilty is shown
in his list of 'characteristics of child sexual abusers', on an
information leaflet published for child care organisations in
Australia.
? pro-offending attitudes
? insensitivity to child issues
? desires to work with vulnerable children
? excessive attention given to a particular child or group of
children
? gift giving
? taking children on trips
? isolates children from other adults
? photographs children
? use of contact therapies, massages, etc.
? regular trips to known "child sex tourism" countries
? appears to have no adult social life
? heavily involved in work but has poor relationships with colleagues
? gaps in references
? uses questionable language or phrases
Some of these indicators would clearly apply to genuine
offenders, however, most of these characteristics can also be
applied to any normal, innocent person. How many parents
take their children on holiday, photograph them and buy them gifts?
Some now use baby massage as a way of soothing fretful infants.
Social workers and child protection experts (of which Wyre is
considered to be one) have desires to work with vulnerable children.
How many adults now have two or more jobs? With financial demands
increasing, this is more common, these adults, whether single,
in a relationship or parents could be considered to have no social
life or heavily involved in work.
This list of indicators is at best unhelpful, at worst,
dangerous.
Another controversial aspect of Wyre’s treatment regards
the conversion of some alleged abusers, into men with homosexual
relationships. He considers that it is better for men who are
believed to have abused boys, and who appear to be unable to conduct
a relationship with a woman, to enter into homosexual relationships.
Gracewell continued to treat men until it's closure in 1993,
however Ray Wyre was not the only person working at Gracewell
whose methods have been considered controversial.
In August 2003, a woman (whose name was changed to prevent her
being identified) who had volunteered at Gracewell in the 1980's
and continued to work there until it's closure, revealed what
most people would consider an unhealthy obsession with convicted
men.
It was claimed that she was in love with the men, some of
whom where convicted child killers, with which she regularly
corresponded and sometimes visited. She claimed to provide them
with emotional and financial support and that this benefited the
men. Amongst those whom she considered to be her friends, were
Sidney Cooke and Robert Maudsley, who ate part of his victims
brain with a spoon.
She also admitted to writing to Ian Huntley, charged with murdering
the two Soham schoolgirls.
This woman, who was a psychology student at the time of the report,
also claimed to have been abused as a child, and who had fallen
in love with her abuser. The desire to befriend men such as Robert
Maudsely came following her abusers rejection of her. "I
love men because of - not in spite of - what they have done."
she said.
The fact that Wyre allowed a person with what appear
to be extremely bizarre, unresolved personal issues volunteer
at Gracewell, is in stark contrast to the opinion he voiced during
a Care Standards Tribunal hearing last year.
A social worker who had worked in social care with children for
30 years, brought an appeal against the decision made by Charles
Clarke to place his name on the Protection of Children Act List.
Though this social worker did not have any allegations made against
him, and had no convictions for any offences involving children,
he had admitted to a colleague that he considered himself to be
a paedophile, stressing that he meant this in the literal sense
of the word.
He had on one occasion considered seducing a young boy who had
been cleaning the social workers' car. It was also claimed that
the social worker would have liked to access child pornography,
but never had done so.
Ray Wyre was called to give evidence as an expert witness. His
evidence was described as both "illuminating and unhelpful".
Wyre's continual reference and comparison to other men he was
working with was considered a hindrance to understanding the case
before the tribunal. It was pointed out that Wyre's agency had
not been involved in assisting the social worker, and the focus
had to be on his case alone.
Wyre considered that the possibility that the social worker
had abused in the past was small and even less so with regard
to the chance of his abusing in the future. At the same time,
Wyre did accept that the element of sexual attraction towards
boys was "quite high".
His evidence then was favourable towards the social worker. Despite
this, Wyre admitted that he could not employ this person in his
agency. He considered that he employs people to do a job and does
not expect them to bring "additional baggage". He would
expect someone with personal problems to get professional help.
This did not prevent him continuing to allow the female volunteer
referred to above, to assist at the Clinic, with whom he had 'agreed
to disagree' over their respective therapy techniques.
Though the appeal was won by majority, the Chair took the unusual
step of recording his dissenting views.
Wyre’s opinions were further questioned regarding snuff
videos. He is quoted as having viewed snuff films first hand in
America. Apparently however, when contacted, he denied having
seen one, and claimed that what he saw was instead a sophisticated
simulation. Though he insists that the FBI did have such films
in their possession and claimed that they were available in England,
both the FBI and Scotland Yard dispute this.
The cult expert at the FBI's training academy at Quantico, Virginia,
Ken Lanning, has stated that in 20 years of searching, he has
never found a documented case of a snuff film anywhere in the
world.
Scotland Yard also denied their existence in England, a detective
in the Obscene Publications Division is quoted as saying "I'd
be the first to know if there were any in Britain. There just
aren't."
His current organisation, Ray Wyre (UK) Ltd., is based in Milton
Keynes and claims to provide services to the accused and their
families. He and his associates are regularly called to provide
expert evidence in criminal cases in the UK and beyond. They claim
to recognise the importance for independent assessment and that
this also leaves "the possibility that the alleged offender
is innocent of the allegations." The requirement for the
accused to admit his guilt, together with Wyre's all-encompassing
indicators make this meaningless.
One former associate, Charles Fortt, was also a probation officer
and had been the principal therapist and clinic manager at Gracewell,
is now an independent consultant on sex crime and domestic violence.
Ray Wyre continues to be a regular speaker in conferences
regarding child protection or the management of sex offenders
(though he does not consider an adult abuser who was abused as
a child to be a 'sex offender'), in the UK and worldwide.
This month Wyre was in the news again, calling for a new organisation
to be formed to tackle self-employed persons who may be considered
a risk to children. Working with him is Labour MP Dan Norris.
Norris has a background in social work and child protection. His
allegations against colleagues whilst working as a teacher in
a care home prior to his training as a social worker, resulted
in dismissals and the closure of the home.
Wyre is currently involved in a prominent residential school
case in Scotland.
Penny Campbell
15 February 2006